Dangers of being a Young Democracy


Bhutan has been lauded worldwide for the miraculous transition it made from a monarchy to a democratic state in 2008. With the world used to savoring on the colossal turmoil and chaos preceding a radical change in a government, it was awestruck to witness the flair with which the great Fourth led Bhutan through the change. The Bhutanese should invariably remember this great achievement of the Fourth Druk Gyalpo among many of his other sacrifices for the country.


Since the transition, Bhutan has seen 3 different political parties head the government. Being new to the political structure, it was certain that the parties were not going to have the smoothest of sails in leading Bhutan through the treacherous phase of modernization. And indeed, the sea got rough and the government found itself, time and again, making decisions in the clarity of summer Gedu fogs. DPT nearly drove off road with its education city initiative. PDP blew out the tyres with its voracious appetite for regional tourists and now DNT wants teachers and doctors on the front seat as it takes control of the wheel.

The two-faced politicians have taken the trusts out of Bhutanese people and used them as stepping stones to build their great enclaves from where they scratch their heads in search for solutions to eradicate poverty, reduce unemployment and narrow the gap. And mind you, they have succeeded to accomplish this mistrust just within a decade of democracy. Unlike a butterfly, when they break out of their cocoon after the election win, they come out uglier and meaner, their pre-win persons completely shed off like the lifeless remains of a dead snake skin.  They gaze up into the sky from their enclaves, and consult with foreign “experts” on solving the country’s problem, when the more viable solutions remain right under their noses.

Do we not have a competent group of people who wants to serve the country out of passion and not just for the financial perks that accompany the post? Why does every parliamentarian just want to increase their pay right after they get into their offices? Is it in the voting period, that we are going wrong? Maybe the problem lies much deeper within the Bhutanese community who doesn’t want to see anything beyond the short-term gains from the people they elect. Patience is one virtue, milked dry by every Bhutanese for their rhetoric deliveries but actually practiced by only a handful. Do we need to select a voting population, based not just on age but on a set of moral criteria? Should we frame similar criteria for those seeking to join the politics?


We must not forget the responsibility assigned to us by our great monarchs. They trusted us enough to relent their thrones and let the people have say in where the nation heads. We cannot afford to lose our focus and let those driven by wealth and greed head the sacred institutions responsible for making laws and policies that shape our country - the country which has been passed down by our forefathers who proudly fought and sacrificed their lives from every threat that came their way. As a young democracy today, we are faced with the danger of getting destabilized from within. We should think for the long run and never give in to the temptations that will inevitably come along our way. Greater good is what we should strive for, as has been done by the monarchs who built this country amidst all the turmoil.  

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Back to Top